Joshua Reynolds
So the news is going around that LACMA is deaccessioning some of it’s collection. First with two paintings (including the Reynolds above) then with around 100 pieces from the costume/textile collection. Now, I have no problem with museums doing this, ideally they would never have to, but realistically storage and funding is finite.
Is it a gamble? Yes. They are getting rid of their only Cranach the Elder painting in possession. Trends (even in art) come and go and in 20 years Michal Govan could be kicking himself (if he’s still there) for making that decision, but most art is a risk. Just because it is hot today, doesn’t mean it will be tomorrow.
I do agree though with Tyler Green though, that if museums were more open and honest about these practices it wouldn’t be such a controversial issue. It happens, and people do take things personally when pieces they are attached to are sold, but it would be much smoother if different institutions didn’t play the whole cloak and dagger routine.
Honesty is the best policy, my mom said that, and don’t pretend like your mom didn’t say that to you.
