But apparently the LA Times thinks that they are?
Eli Broad, Los Angeles’ leading philanthropist, is asking the city and county to give him a piece of property downtown for an art museum to house his collection — a museum he’s offering to build and endow. As they consider that request, the Board of Supervisors, the City Council and other agencies of local government should base their decisions not on what is best for Broad but on what best serves the public. And they should approve this deal.
via…
I sort of stopped following this story a while ago (sorry) because I got bored with the Broad baiting, but I haven’t seen one article or even a quote against Eli’s proposed museum. All I have read is the fight over the location between Beverly Hills (now out of the race), Santa Monica and Downtown (so Deitch can have a friend to play with). I wish they had linked to any sort of dissenting voice so I could feel better about reading this article filled with information that anyone with common sense most people who have an active interest in art already knows.
June 15, 2010, 2:06pm