The Guggenheim Museum and YouTube have finally announced the jury for YouTube Play.
Do I have thoughts about this Guggenheim/YouTube mashup ploy for attention and desperate attempt by the Gugg to be in with the internet age? I think I blatantly answered that question by just the wording of my question. Sometimes I am too obvious. Anywho, that’s not what we are talking about today, today we are talking about the selection of the jury! So who is this group of elite internet multimedia artists and experts to serve on this panel? I’ll tell you who, along with my unfiltered thoughts about their fitness as jurors.
- Laurie Anderson, I am not too familiar with her work, but from what I do know, she goes to the beat of her own drum enough that I think she will make some honest decisions.
- Animal Collective. REALLY!?! I already have mentioned what a ploy I think this is, but Animal Collective? I like there music just as much as the next girl who likes to occasionally listen to music that isn’t hip hop, but I really don’t see what they can bring to the table besides inexperience, naivety and a little “we’re in a popular band so our opinions matter” attitude.*
-
Darren Aronofsky is a great director. Period. I love him and enjoy his work. Wait…aren’t you making Black Swan right now, Darren? Oh you are. Then you shouldn’t have time to be doing this! I am looking forward to that film and if it sucks I am going to blame your being sidetracked by this silly jury and farce of a competition as the reason and never watch The Fountain
by myself and cryagain. - Douglas Gordon. Gordon’s video and visual art are quiet and thoughtful enough that I think he is a genuinely good addition to the jury. Also he’s a little older, 44, and been doing this for a while, so that experience will be useful.
- Ryan McGinley seems to be too nice and too grateful to ever say anything critical about anyone in regards to art. That being said, I don’t know the guy, maybe he’s brutal in his opinions outside of the public persona he has created. I just really don’t think that’s the case.
- Takashi Murakami. Sure, why not? He hasn’t sold out with a museum show in a while so he has some spare time. Also, someone has to be there to defend anyone using semen as a lasso in their videos.
- Marylin Minter, I think that Minter was an early purveyor of video and she still employs it today, so I am ok with this choice.
- Shirin Neshat, Stefan Sagemeister and Apichatpong Weerasethakul, I have never heard of one of these people, although I enjoy the last name of Sagemeister, it makes him sound like some expert of the spices. He might make me a delicious bolognese sauce.
- Nancy Spector, Deputy Director and Chief Curator of the Guggenheim, is the Jury Chair. Understandable.
Now for more traditional interpretations including monetary advantages for the museum, I would highly suggest reading what Paddy Johnson and Tyler Green have to say about this.
*I’m sure they are very nice and smart people, I just think they aren’t necessarily qualified to be on a jury for something concerning the Guggenheim.













